Cordless Vacuums / LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS vs Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS vs Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS
Two batteries and a bagless auto-empty tower; 120 minutes means both, with no nozzle.
Wins overall by 2.4 points
Quick Verdict
A 2.4-point gap makes the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS the straightforward choice here. Two batteries and a bagless auto-empty tower; 120 minutes means both, with no nozzle.
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS and Wyze Cordless Vacuum S are both closely matched cordless Vacuum models, and the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is $646 cheaper than the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS ($129.99 vs $775.99). On Filtration & Sealing, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads (8.0 vs 3.5/10) — whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at. On Sustained Runtime, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads (8.0 vs 4.5/10) — how long the machine really runs on max power with the motorised floor head attached — not the eco-mode, bare-tool figure on the box. On Battery System, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — removable or sealed, how many packs are included, what a spare costs and whether the pack is shared across a range. Overall, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 8.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 5.9/10 for the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS | Wyze Cordless Vacuum S |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $775.99 | $129.99 |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Machine Type | Dry cordless stick vacuum with a bagless auto-empty charging tower | Dry cordless stick vacuum, converts to handheld |
| Suction (as published) | 210 air watts maximum, per the Home Depot spec sheet. LG's own product page states no suction figure at all | Sources conflict on units: Wyze quotes 20,000 Pa in Turbo (9,000 Medium, 6,000 Eco) and separately claims '100 AW'. Pa is sealed suction measured at a blocked inlet, not work done at the head, and 100 AW alongside 20,000 Pa is not a figure Wyze substantiates |
| Runtime, Eco / Headline (min) | 120✓ | 40 |
| Runtime, Max Power (min) | Not published by the manufacturer | 10 |
| What the Runtime Claim Actually Means | LG states the condition itself: 'up to 120 minutes' is two 60-minute batteries added together, in Normal mode, without a power nozzle attached. Fit the Dual Floor Max nozzle and the figure drops sharply; LG publishes no per-mode table | Wyze publishes all three modes — 40 minutes Eco, 23 Medium, 10 Turbo — but does not state whether the powered floor head is fitted for any of them |
| Removable Battery | Yes — two quick-release batteries included, and the tower charges both simultaneously | Yes — removable 6-cell pack (2,000 mAh x 6, 21.6 V DC), 4-6 hours to charge |
| Spare Battery | Not published by the manufacturer | Not published by the manufacturer |
| Dock / Wall Mount | All-in-One Tower included: free-standing, charges both batteries, stores tools and auto-empties the bin | Neither. An AC charger only — no wall mount, no dock, no stand in the box |
| Filtration | 5-step filtration with a HEPA element, LG claims 99.99% of dust; the tower adds a 3-stage filter claimed at 99.9%. LG publishes no whole-machine seal certification | 3-stage with a filter Wyze calls HEPA but rates at '95% of particles under 0.3 micron'. Genuine HEPA is 99.97% at 0.3 micron. No sealed-system claim |
| Bin / Tank Capacity | Kompressor compresses the contents — LG claims 2.4x the capacity of a non-Kompressor bin. The tower is bagless | Sources conflict: Wyze's own product page gives 0.55 L in one place and 0.7 L in another |
| Weight (lbs) | 5.95 | 4.9✓ |
| Filters, Consumables & Self-Clean | Cyclone and filters are removable and washable, so there is no scheduled filter purchase. The bagless tower means no consumable bags either | Washable filter. Wyze publishes no replacement schedule, no filter price and no brush-roll availability |
| Warranty | 12 months | 12 months |
| Colors | Iron Grey | White/Grey |
Category Scores
Suction Power
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 7.5 against 4.5 — a 3.0-point margin on actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Sustained Runtime
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 8.0 against 4.5 — a 3.5-point margin on how long the machine really runs on max power with the motorised floor head attached — not the eco-mode, bare-tool figure on the box. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Filtration & Sealing
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 8.0 against 3.5 — a 4.5-point margin on whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Handling & Ergonomics
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS and Wyze Cordless Vacuum S are level here, at 9.0/10 each. weight, balance, whether power is a push-button or a trigger you must hold, and how it stores is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Maintenance & Emptying
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 9.0 against 6.0 — a 3.0-point margin on bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Battery System
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on removable or sealed, how many packs are included, what a spare costs and whether the pack is shared across a range. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Versatility
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS leads clearly here, 7.5 against 5.5 — a 2.0-point margin on handheld conversion, above-floor tools, carpet capability and wet-mopping ability. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S leads clearly here, 8.5 against 7.5 — a 1.0-point margin on what you actually get for the street price once consumables and missing accessories are counted. If that is what you are buying for, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS if…
- • Filtration & Sealing matters most to you — the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 8.0/10 here (whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at).
- • Sustained Runtime matters most to you — the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 8.0/10 here (how long the machine really runs on max power with the motorised floor head attached — not the eco-mode, bare-tool figure on the box).
- • Battery System matters most to you — the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 9.5/10 here (removable or sealed, how many packs are included, what a spare costs and whether the pack is shared across a range).
- • Suction Power matters most to you — the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 7.5/10 here (actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted).
- • Maintenance & Emptying matters most to you — the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores 9.0/10 here (bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent).
Choose the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S if…
- • You want to spend less — it's $646 cheaper.
Pros & Cons
LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS
Pros
- +The only machine here that ships with two batteries, and the tower charges both at once — a genuine 2x working session
- +The auto-empty tower is bagless, so unlike Samsung's Clean Station there is nothing to keep buying
- +5.95 lb is the lightest full-size stick vacuum on this page
- +Kompressor physically compacts the bin contents, so you empty it far less often than a 0.5 L rival
Cons
- −The 120-minute headline is two batteries combined, in Normal mode, with no power nozzle fitted — LG's own footnote says so
- −210 air watts sits well under Dyson's 240 and Samsung's 400, and LG only publishes it on retailer spec sheets, not its own page
- −Only 1 year of parts-and-labour cover; the 10-year figure covers the motor alone
- −LG's US stick line churns fast — the A927 and A929 siblings are already discontinued
Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
Pros
- +$129.99 for a removable battery, a motorised head and a published three-mode runtime table
- +4.9 lb assembled — light enough to carry upstairs one-handed, and the handheld half is 2.8 lb
- +Publishes suction per mode as well as runtime per mode, which most budget brands avoid
- +A second motor in the brush head rather than a passive roller
Cons
- −The 'HEPA filter' is rated at 95% of sub-0.3-micron particles. Real HEPA means 99.97%. This is not an allergy vacuum whatever the listing says
- −No wall mount, no dock, no stand — it ships with a bare AC charger and nowhere to put it
- −10 minutes in Turbo, and Wyze will not say whether that is with the floor head running
- −Wyze's own page gives two different bin capacities, which does not inspire confidence in the rest of the sheet
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS or Wyze Cordless Vacuum S better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Filtration & Sealing, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores higher on Filtration & Sealing (8.0/10 vs 3.5/10) — whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at.
Which is better for Sustained Runtime, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores higher on Sustained Runtime (8.0/10 vs 4.5/10) — how long the machine really runs on max power with the motorised floor head attached — not the eco-mode, bare-tool figure on the box.
Which is better for Battery System, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores higher on Battery System (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — removable or sealed, how many packs are included, what a spare costs and whether the pack is shared across a range.
Which is better for Suction Power, the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS scores higher on Suction Power (7.5/10 vs 4.5/10) — actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted.
Is the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS worth the price difference over the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is the cheaper option at $129.99 versus $775.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Filtration & Sealing.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS is the better fit if you mainly care about allergies or deep-carpet. The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is the better fit for hard-floors or pet-hair.
What's the warranty on the LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS vs the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The LG CordZero All-in-One A937KGMS ships with a 12-month warranty; the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S ships with a 12-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Premium Option
Samsung Bespoke AI Jet Ultra (VS90F40DMK/AA) — $847.00
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.