Cordless Vacuums / Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) vs Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) vs Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020)
The most honest runtime figures in the category, on the least published suction.
Wins overall by 1.9 points
Quick Verdict
A 1.9-point gap makes the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) the straightforward choice here. The most honest runtime figures in the category, on the least published suction.
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) and Wyze Cordless Vacuum S are both closely matched cordless Vacuum models, and the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is $1,069 cheaper than the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) ($129.99 vs $1,199). On Filtration & Sealing, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads (9.5 vs 3.5/10) — whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at. On Maintenance & Emptying, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent. On Value, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S leads (8.5 vs 5.0/10) — what you actually get for the street price once consumables and missing accessories are counted. Overall, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores 7.8/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 5.9/10 for the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) | Wyze Cordless Vacuum S |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1199.00 | $129.99 |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
| Machine Type | Dry cordless stick vacuum, 3-in-1 convertible (top-mount, floor-mount or handheld) | Dry cordless stick vacuum, converts to handheld |
| Suction (as published) | Not published by the manufacturer — Miele publishes three electronic power levels but no air-watt, Pa or motor-watt suction figure | Sources conflict on units: Wyze quotes 20,000 Pa in Turbo (9,000 Medium, 6,000 Eco) and separately claims '100 AW'. Pa is sealed suction measured at a blocked inlet, not work done at the head, and 100 AW alongside 20,000 Pa is not a figure Wyze substantiates |
| Runtime, Eco / Headline (min) | 60✓ | 40 |
| Runtime, Max Power (min) | 17✓ | 10 |
| What the Runtime Claim Actually Means | Miele's own support page gives the real table: 60 minutes at MIN level with the PowerUnit alone (no powered head), falling to 14-17 minutes at maximum power with an electrobrush attached. The '120 minutes' on the box is two 60-minute batteries added together | Wyze publishes all three modes — 40 minutes Eco, 23 Medium, 10 Turbo — but does not state whether the powered floor head is fitted for any of them |
| Removable Battery | Yes — two 25.2 V / 2500 mAh Vortex batteries included, swappable without tools | Yes — removable 6-cell pack (2,000 mAh x 6, 21.6 V DC), 4-6 hours to charge |
| Spare Battery | $229.00 from Miele USA | Not published by the manufacturer |
| Dock / Wall Mount | Wall mount and charging tray included; there is no floor dock and no auto-empty. The machine free-stands unaided | Neither. An AC charger only — no wall mount, no dock, no stand in the box |
| Filtration | Maintenance-free HEPA Lifetime filter, 99.999% dust retention claimed. Miele publishes no whole-machine seal certification | 3-stage with a filter Wyze calls HEPA but rates at '95% of particles under 0.3 micron'. Genuine HEPA is 99.97% at 0.3 micron. No sealed-system claim |
| Bin / Tank Capacity | 0.5 L bin with a bottom release | Sources conflict: Wyze's own product page gives 0.55 L in one place and 0.7 L in another |
| Weight (lbs) | 8 | 4.9✓ |
| Filters, Consumables & Self-Clean | The HEPA Lifetime filter is designed never to be replaced, so there is no filter consumable at all. Spare batteries at $229 are the only real running cost | Washable filter. Wyze publishes no replacement schedule, no filter price and no brush-roll availability |
| Warranty | 24 months | 12 months |
| Colors | Infinity Grey PearlFinish / Rose Gold | White/Grey |
Category Scores
Suction Power
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 7.5 against 4.5 — a 3.0-point margin on actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Sustained Runtime
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 6.0 against 4.5 — a 1.5-point margin on how long the machine really runs on max power with the motorised floor head attached — not the eco-mode, bare-tool figure on the box. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Filtration & Sealing
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 3.5 — a 6.0-point margin on whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Handling & Ergonomics
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on weight, balance, whether power is a push-button or a trigger you must hold, and how it stores. If that is what you are buying for, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Maintenance & Emptying
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Battery System
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 6.0 — a 2.0-point margin on removable or sealed, how many packs are included, what a spare costs and whether the pack is shared across a range. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Versatility
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 5.5 — a 3.0-point margin on handheld conversion, above-floor tools, carpet capability and wet-mopping ability. If that is what you are buying for, the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S leads clearly here, 8.5 against 5.0 — a 3.5-point margin on what you actually get for the street price once consumables and missing accessories are counted. If that is what you are buying for, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) if…
- • Filtration & Sealing matters most to you — the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores 9.5/10 here (whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at).
- • Maintenance & Emptying matters most to you — the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores 9.5/10 here (bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent).
- • Suction Power matters most to you — the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores 7.5/10 here (actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted).
- • Versatility matters most to you — the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores 8.5/10 here (handheld conversion, above-floor tools, carpet capability and wet-mopping ability).
- • Your main use case is allergies or deep-carpet.
Choose the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S if…
- • Value matters most to you — the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S scores 8.5/10 here (what you actually get for the street price once consumables and missing accessories are counted).
- • You want to spend less — it's $1,069 cheaper.
Pros & Cons
Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020)
Pros
- +Miele publishes the real runtime table — including 14-17 minutes at max with the electrobrush — where almost every rival publishes only a best case
- +Two batteries included plus a HEPA filter Miele says never needs replacing: the lowest consumable cost in the category
- +The 3-in-1 body lets you put the motor at the floor end for stairs or on top for balance, and it stands up on its own
- +Push-button power, not a held trigger
Cons
- −$1,199 and Miele will not publish a suction figure of any kind, so you cannot compare it on paper with a Dyson or a Samsung
- −Spare batteries are $229 each — more than twice Dyson's $99.99
- −No auto-empty tower is offered at any price, unlike LG and Samsung at lower money
- −The '120 minutes' on the box is two batteries, at minimum power, with no powered head fitted
Wyze Cordless Vacuum S
Pros
- +$129.99 for a removable battery, a motorised head and a published three-mode runtime table
- +4.9 lb assembled — light enough to carry upstairs one-handed, and the handheld half is 2.8 lb
- +Publishes suction per mode as well as runtime per mode, which most budget brands avoid
- +A second motor in the brush head rather than a passive roller
Cons
- −The 'HEPA filter' is rated at 95% of sub-0.3-micron particles. Real HEPA means 99.97%. This is not an allergy vacuum whatever the listing says
- −No wall mount, no dock, no stand — it ships with a bare AC charger and nowhere to put it
- −10 minutes in Turbo, and Wyze will not say whether that is with the floor head running
- −Wyze's own page gives two different bin capacities, which does not inspire confidence in the rest of the sheet
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) or Wyze Cordless Vacuum S better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Filtration & Sealing, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores higher on Filtration & Sealing (9.5/10 vs 3.5/10) — whether the whole machine is sealed or a HEPA element simply sits inside a leaky body, and what the claimed rating is actually measured at.
Which is better for Maintenance & Emptying, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores higher on Maintenance & Emptying (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — bin or tank emptying, whether your hand ends up near the dust, self-clean quality and the ongoing cost of filters, bags and detergent.
Which is better for Value, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S scores higher on Value (8.5/10 vs 5.0/10) — what you actually get for the street price once consumables and missing accessories are counted.
Which is better for Suction Power, the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) or the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) scores higher on Suction Power (7.5/10 vs 4.5/10) — actual cleaning force at the head, judged on air watts where a maker publishes them and discounted where only Pa or motor watts are quoted.
Is the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) worth the price difference over the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is the cheaper option at $129.99 versus $1,199. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Filtration & Sealing.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) is the better fit if you mainly care about allergies or deep-carpet. The Wyze Cordless Vacuum S is the better fit for hard-floors or pet-hair.
What's the warranty on the Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) vs the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S?+
The Miele Triflex HX2 Pro (11827020) ships with a 24-month warranty; the Wyze Cordless Vacuum S ships with a 12-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.