Fitness Trackers / Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)
Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) vs Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)
Amazfit Bip 6 (2025)
Real built-in GPS and 14-day battery for $79.99 — the connected-GPS trap's cheapest escape.
Wins overall by 1.5 points
Quick Verdict
A 1.5-point gap makes the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) the straightforward choice here. Real built-in GPS and 14-day battery for $79.99 — the connected-GPS trap's cheapest escape.
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) and Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) are both closely matched fitness Tracker models, and the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) is $20 cheaper than the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) ($59.99 vs $79.99). On Phone Independence, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads (9.0 vs 1.5/10) — how much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low.. On Tracking Accuracy, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads (7.0 vs 6.0/10) — how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.. On Display & Usability, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads (9.0 vs 8.0/10) — screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.. Overall, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 8.1/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 6.6/10 for the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) | Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $79.99 | $59.99 |
| Release Year | 2025 | 2024 |
| GPS | Built-in GNSS across five satellite systems, with free offline maps — no phone required for route or pace | None — no GPS chip. It uses the paired phone's location; without a phone it estimates distance from the accelerometer and reviewers measured it undermeasuring a 5km track by 50m or more |
| Display | 1.97-inch AMOLED touchscreen | 1.6-inch AMOLED touchscreen with optional always-on mode |
| Rated Battery Life ( days) | 14✓ | 13 |
| What the Battery Claim Assumes | Amazfit's 14 days is 'typical use'; battery-saver mode stretches to 26 days. Continuous GPS use and the always-on display are not covered by the 14-day figure. Full charge 1.5–2.5 hours | Samsung's 13 days is explicitly 'with Always On Display turned off (default setting)'. Independent testing under moderate-to-heavy use returned roughly 7–10 days |
| Subscription Model | None — every metric and the offline maps are free | None — Samsung Health is free |
| Annual Subscription Cost ($) | 0 | 0 |
| Water Resistance | 5 ATM / 50 m for up to 10 minutes | 5 ATM (50 m for 10 minutes) plus IP68 |
| ECG / AFib & FDA Status | No ECG hardware and no AFib detection | No ECG hardware and no AFib detection — Samsung's ECG is restricted to Galaxy Watch models paired with a Galaxy phone |
| SpO2 Sensor | Yes — blood oxygen plus stress and sleep via BioTracker | Yes — blood oxygen during sleep |
| Phone Compatibility | iOS and Android via the Zepp app (text reply is Android-only) | Android only. There is no iOS app for the Fit3, and setup is smoothest on a Samsung phone |
| Charger | Proprietary magnetic charging cradle terminating in USB-C. Amazfit's US product page states a cable is not included as a sustainability measure — confirm box contents before buying | Proprietary pogo-pin cable; no wall adapter is included in the box |
| Data Export | Zepp syncs to Strava, Google Fit and Apple Health; no documented bulk-export format | Samsung Health offers a personal-data download; third-party sync generally needs Health Connect on Android |
| Warranty | 12 months | 12 months |
| Colors | Black, Stone, Red | Dark Gray, Silver, Pink Gold |
Category Scores
Tracking Accuracy
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 7.0 against 6.0 — a 1.0-point margin on how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Subscription Freedom
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) and Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) are level here, at 9.5/10 each. the category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying. is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Phone Independence
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 1.5 — a 7.5-point margin on how much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Battery Life
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Display & Usability
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Health Features
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 6.0 against 5.5 — a 0.5-point margin on depth of the health sensor suite and how much of it is FDA-cleared and enabled in the US.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
App & Data Portability
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 6.0 against 5.5 — a 0.5-point margin on quality of the companion app and whether you can get your own data out in a documented format.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.5 — a 1.0-point margin on what the first year genuinely costs — purchase price plus any subscription needed for the advertised features.. If that is what you are buying for, the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) if…
- • Phone Independence matters most to you — the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 9.0/10 here (how much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low.).
- • Tracking Accuracy matters most to you — the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 7.0/10 here (how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.).
- • Display & Usability matters most to you — the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 9.0/10 here (screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.).
- • Value matters most to you — the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 9.5/10 here (what the first year genuinely costs — purchase price plus any subscription needed for the advertised features.).
- • Battery Life matters most to you — the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores 9.0/10 here (real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.).
Choose the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) if…
- • You want to spend less — it's $20 cheaper.
Pros & Cons
Amazfit Bip 6 (2025)
Pros
- +Real multi-band GNSS and offline maps for $79.99 — half the price of the cheapest Fitbit with a GPS chip
- +14-day typical battery with a 1.97-inch AMOLED is a combination nothing else here matches
- +Standard 22mm quick-release straps, so replacements are a few dollars rather than $35
- +No subscription, no gated metrics, works with both iPhone and Android
Cons
- −Amazfit's US page says no charging cable is included in the box — verify before you buy, because the cradle is proprietary
- −No ECG, no AFib detection and no FDA-cleared health feature of any kind
- −Zepp's recovery and sleep modelling is shallower than Garmin's or WHOOP's, and there is no documented bulk data export
- −Sits awkwardly between band and watch — it is 46mm, so it wears like a watch not a slim tracker
- −The 14-day claim does not survive regular GPS workouts or the always-on display
Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)
Pros
- +Aluminium body and a 1.6-inch AMOLED for $59.99
- +5 ATM plus IP68 is the most thorough water/dust rating in the budget tier
- +Nothing is paywalled and Samsung Health is a mature, free app
- +Fall detection and SOS are rare features at this price
Cons
- −Android only — there is no iPhone app, which rules the Fit3 out entirely for iOS users
- −No GPS chip, and phone-free distance estimation was measured undermeasuring a 5km track by 50m+
- −The 13-day claim is with the always-on display off; real-world use lands nearer 7–10 days
- −Proprietary pogo-pin charging cable and no wall adapter in the box
- −Best-behaved on a Samsung phone; on other Android handsets setup is clumsier
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) or Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Phone Independence, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) or the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores higher on Phone Independence (9.0/10 vs 1.5/10) — how much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low..
Which is better for Tracking Accuracy, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) or the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores higher on Tracking Accuracy (7.0/10 vs 6.0/10) — how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity..
Which is better for Display & Usability, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) or the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores higher on Display & Usability (9.0/10 vs 8.0/10) — screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout..
Which is better for Value, the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) or the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) scores higher on Value (9.5/10 vs 8.5/10) — what the first year genuinely costs — purchase price plus any subscription needed for the advertised features..
Is the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) worth the price difference over the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) is the cheaper option at $59.99 versus $79.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Phone Independence.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) is the better fit if you mainly care about built-in-gps. The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) is the better fit for no-subscription or everyday-steps.
What's the warranty on the Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) vs the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024)?+
The Amazfit Bip 6 (2025) ships with a 12-month warranty; the Samsung Galaxy Fit3 (2024) ships with a 12-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 (2025, Global Version) — $51.99
Premium Option
Amazfit Helio Strap (2025) — $99.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.