TCRThe Comparison Report

Fitness Trackers / Polar Loop (2025) vs Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)

Polar Loop (2025) vs Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)

Best Overall (Close Call)

Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)

A month of battery in a steel watch case — with no ECG, no SpO2 and no GPS chip.

Wins overall by 0.1 points

Buy on Amazon

Quick Verdict

Too close to call on score alone: 0.1 points separate them. A month of battery in a steel watch case — with no ECG, no SpO2 and no GPS chip. The Polar Loop (2025) answers with a different set of strengths, so let the categories below decide it.

The Polar Loop (2025) and Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) are both closely matched fitness Tracker models, and the Polar Loop (2025) is $50 cheaper than the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) ($199.99 vs $249.95). On Battery Life, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.. On Display & Usability, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) leads (5.0 vs 2.0/10) — screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.. On Subscription Freedom, the Polar Loop (2025) leads (9.5 vs 8.0/10) — the category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying.. Overall, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) scores 6.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 6.2/10 for the Polar Loop (2025), though the gap is close enough that your specific use case should decide it. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.

Side-by-Side Comparison

SpecPolar Loop (2025)Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
Price$199.99$249.95
Release Year20252024
GPSNone — no GPS chip. The Polar Flow app can use the phone's GPS when you start an outdoor session manuallyConnected GPS at best — the Amazon listing advertises 'Connected GPS' using the phone, while Withings' own shop spec sheet does not list GPS at all. Sources conflict; either way there is no GPS chip in the watch
DisplayNone — screenless; everything is read in Polar FlowAnalogue hands plus a 0.63-inch grayscale OLED sub-display (282 PPI)
Rated Battery Life ( days)830
What the Battery Claim AssumesPolar rates up to 8 days with continuous HR active; the band holds about four weeks of data if it goes unsyncedSources conflict: Withings' own shop page claims up to 35 days, while the Amazon listing title and launch coverage say 30 days. No SpO2 sensor is drawing power
Subscription ModelNone. Polar states full access to every feature from day one with no monthly fee — the explicit anti-WHOOP positionOptional — Withings+ adds cardiologist ECG review, the AI Health Assistant, NutriCare and Readiness scoring. One month is included. Withings does not publish the Withings+ price on its US product or subscription pages
Annual Subscription Cost ($)0Not published on Withings' US Withings+ page
Water ResistanceWR30 — Polar rates it for bathing and swimming, a weaker rating than the 5 ATM bands here5 ATM / 50 m, swimproof
ECG / AFib & FDA StatusNo ECG hardware and no AFib detectionNo ECG on the Light — Withings reserves ECG and AFib detection for ScanWatch 2 and Nova. The cardiologist ECG review sold under Withings+ therefore does not apply to this model
SpO2 SensorNot listed by Polar for the Loop — the sensor package is optical HR, HRV and accelerometerNo — Withings explicitly omits the SpO2 sensor on the Light
Phone CompatibilityiOS and Android via Polar FlowiOS and Android via Withings Health Mate
ChargerProprietary Polar Charge 2.0 USB-C cable (included)Proprietary magnetic puck
Data ExportStrongest in the screenless class — Polar Flow exports sessions as TCX/GPX, offers a full account data export and a documented AccessLink APIHealth Mate offers a full account data export in CSV, and Withings publishes a developer API
Warranty24 months24 months
ColorsBlack, Greige, BlueBlack & Silver, White & Rose Gold, Green, Blue

Category Scores

Tracking AccuracyHow closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.
Polar Loop (2025)
8.0
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
7.0
Subscription FreedomThe category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying.
Polar Loop (2025)
9.5
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
8.0
Phone IndependenceHow much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low.
Polar Loop (2025)
2.5
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
2.0
Battery LifeReal endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.
Polar Loop (2025)
6.0
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
9.5
Display & UsabilityScreen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.
Polar Loop (2025)
2.0
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
5.0
Health FeaturesDepth of the health sensor suite and how much of it is FDA-cleared and enabled in the US.
Polar Loop (2025)
6.5
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
5.5
App & Data PortabilityQuality of the companion app and whether you can get your own data out in a documented format.
Polar Loop (2025)
8.5
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
8.0
ValueWhat the first year genuinely costs — purchase price plus any subscription needed for the advertised features.
Polar Loop (2025)
6.5
Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)
5.5
Tracking AccuracySubscription FreedomPhone IndependenceBattery LifeDisplay & UsabilityHealth FeaturesApp & Data PortabilityValue
Polar Loop (2025) Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)

Tracking Accuracy

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 7.0 — a 1.0-point margin on how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Subscription Freedom

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.0 — a 1.5-point margin on the category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Phone Independence

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 2.5 against 2.0 — a 0.5-point margin on how much the device can do with the phone left at home — a real GPS chip and on-wrist readouts score high, connected-GPS screenless bands score low.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Battery Life

The Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.. If that is what you are buying for, the Polar Loop (2025) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Display & Usability

The Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) leads clearly here, 5.0 against 2.0 — a 3.0-point margin on screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.. If that is what you are buying for, the Polar Loop (2025) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Health Features

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 6.5 against 5.5 — a 1.0-point margin on depth of the health sensor suite and how much of it is FDA-cleared and enabled in the US.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

App & Data Portability

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 8.0 — a 0.5-point margin on quality of the companion app and whether you can get your own data out in a documented format.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Value

The Polar Loop (2025) leads clearly here, 6.5 against 5.5 — a 1.0-point margin on what the first year genuinely costs — purchase price plus any subscription needed for the advertised features.. If that is what you are buying for, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Best For

Choose the Polar Loop (2025) if…

  • Subscription Freedom matters most to you — the Polar Loop (2025) scores 9.5/10 here (the category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying.).
  • Tracking Accuracy matters most to you — the Polar Loop (2025) scores 8.0/10 here (how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity.).
  • Health Features matters most to you — the Polar Loop (2025) scores 6.5/10 here (depth of the health sensor suite and how much of it is FDA-cleared and enabled in the US.).
  • You want to spend less — it's $50 cheaper.
  • Your main use case is screenless.

Choose the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) if…

  • Battery Life matters most to you — the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) scores 9.5/10 here (real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure.).
  • Display & Usability matters most to you — the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) scores 5.0/10 here (screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout.).
  • Your main use case is everyday-steps.

Pros & Cons

Polar Loop (2025)

Pros

  • +Polar's sports-science pedigree — Nightly Recharge and SleepWise — with no subscription attached
  • +Two band sizes in the box, so the fit problem is solved at purchase
  • +Real data portability: TCX/GPX export, account export and a documented API
  • +Two-year warranty, double the Fitbit and Amazfit norm

Cons

  • $199.99 for a screenless band with no GPS chip and no SpO2 — the $99.99 Amazfit Helio Strap does the same job
  • WR30 rather than 5 ATM, the weakest water rating in this comparison
  • 8 days is the shortest battery life of any screenless band here
  • No ECG, no AFib detection, no FDA-cleared health feature
  • Polar Flow's interface is dated next to WHOOP's and Google Health's

Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)

Pros

  • +A month or more per charge, by far the longest run time in this comparison
  • +Stainless steel and real analogue hands — it passes as a watch, not a fitness band
  • +CSV account export and a public API make your data genuinely portable
  • +Two-year warranty and HSA/FSA eligibility

Cons

  • $249.95 buys no ECG, no SpO2 and no GPS chip — the 'Light' name is doing a lot of work
  • Sources conflict on both battery life (30 vs 35 days) and whether connected GPS is supported at all
  • The Withings+ features most people want, including cardiologist ECG review, need hardware this model does not have
  • Withings does not publish the Withings+ price on its US pages, so the real cost of ownership is unclear at purchase
  • The 0.63-inch grayscale sub-display shows very little at a glance

Shop by Need

FAQs

Is the Polar Loop (2025) or Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) better overall?+

Based on our 8-category scoring, the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.

Which is better for Battery Life, the Polar Loop (2025) or the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) scores higher on Battery Life (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — real endurance once continuous heart rate, SpO2 and the always-on display are enabled, not just the headline figure..

Which is better for Display & Usability, the Polar Loop (2025) or the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) scores higher on Display & Usability (5.0/10 vs 2.0/10) — screen size, brightness and how much you can actually read on the wrist mid-workout..

Which is better for Subscription Freedom, the Polar Loop (2025) or the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Polar Loop (2025) scores higher on Subscription Freedom (9.5/10 vs 8.0/10) — the category's trap dimension: how much of what you paid for keeps working without a membership. A 10 means nothing is paywalled; a 1 means the hardware is unusable the moment you stop paying..

Which is better for Tracking Accuracy, the Polar Loop (2025) or the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Polar Loop (2025) scores higher on Tracking Accuracy (8.0/10 vs 7.0/10) — how closely steps, heart rate and sleep match reference devices — and how badly the optical sensor falls apart at high intensity..

Is the Polar Loop (2025) worth the price difference over the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Polar Loop (2025) is the cheaper option at $199.99 versus $249.95. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Battery Life.

Which is better suited to my use case?+

The Polar Loop (2025) is the better fit if you mainly care about screenless. The Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) is the better fit for everyday-steps.

What's the warranty on the Polar Loop (2025) vs the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm)?+

The Polar Loop (2025) ships with a 24-month warranty; the Withings ScanWatch Light (37mm) ships with a 24-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.

Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+

If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.

Cheaper Option

Garmin vívosmart 5 (2022) — $149.99

Premium Option

WHOOP MG (Life membership) — $359.00

Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.

You May Also Like