TCRThe Comparison Report

USB Chargers / UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) vs Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)

UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) vs Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)

Best Overall (Close Call)

Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)

30W and PPS in an Apple-20W-sized body — the default small charger.

Wins overall by 0.2 points

Buy on Amazon

Quick Verdict

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) wins by 0.2 points, which is not enough to settle it. 65W across three ports — but all three loaded drops two of them to 8.5W. Pick on the specs that matter to you, not the overall score.

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) and Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) are both current-generation USB Charger models, and the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is $17 cheaper than the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) ($22.99 vs $39.99). On Power Sharing, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads (10.0 vs 4.5/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. On Ports, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) leads (7.0 vs 2.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once. On Output Power, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) leads (7.0 vs 5.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum. Overall, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 7.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.1/10 for the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334), though the gap is close enough that your specific use case should decide it. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.

Side-by-Side Comparison

SpecUGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
Price$39.99$22.99
Release Year20222022
Max Total Output (W)6530
Single-Port Max6530
Ports2x USB-C, 1x USB-A1x USB-C
GaNYesYes
USB-PD & PPSPD 3.0 with PPSPD 3.0 with PPS (3.3-11V/2.7A and 3.3-16V/2A)
Foldable ProngsYesYes
Dimensions66 x 40.6 x 30.5mm28.4 x 28.4 x 35.3mm
Weight (g)122Not published by the manufacturer
Laptop ChargingYes for a 14-inch laptop at standard speed; not for a 16-inchNo
Power SharingTwo USB-C gives 45W plus 20W. USB-C plus USB-A gives 45W plus 18W. All three ports gives 45W plus 8.5W plus 8.5WNot applicable — single port
DisplayNoneNone
Warranty18 months18 months
ColorsBlack, WhiteBlack, White, Blue, Green

Category Scores

Output PowerTotal wattage and single-port maximum
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
7.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
5.0
PortsHow many devices it can charge at once
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
7.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
2.0
Power SharingHow well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
4.5
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
10.0
PortabilitySize, weight and whether the prongs fold
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
9.5
Build QualityMaterials, heat handling and warranty
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
8.5
FeaturesDisplays, protocol support and extras
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
6.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
6.0
CompatibilityPPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
8.5
ValueWatts and ports relative to price
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
9.0
Output PowerPortsPower SharingPortabilityBuild QualityFeaturesCompatibilityValue
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)

Output Power

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) leads clearly here, 7.0 against 5.0 — a 2.0-point margin on total wattage and single-port maximum. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Ports

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) leads clearly here, 7.0 against 2.0 — a 5.0-point margin on how many devices it can charge at once. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Power Sharing

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 10.0 against 4.5 — a 5.5-point margin on how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Portability

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.0 — a 1.5-point margin on size, weight and whether the prongs fold. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Build Quality

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 8.0 — a 0.5-point margin on materials, heat handling and warranty. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Features

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) and Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) are level here, at 6.0/10 each. displays, protocol support and extras is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.

Compatibility

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 8.0 — a 0.5-point margin on PPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Value

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on watts and ports relative to price. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Best For

Choose the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) if…

  • Ports matters most to you — the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) scores 7.0/10 here (how many devices it can charge at once).
  • Output Power matters most to you — the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) scores 7.0/10 here (total wattage and single-port maximum).
  • Your main use case is laptop or multi-device.

Choose the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) if…

  • Power Sharing matters most to you — the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 10.0/10 here (how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by).
  • Portability matters most to you — the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 9.5/10 here (size, weight and whether the prongs fold).
  • Value matters most to you — the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 9.0/10 here (watts and ports relative to price).
  • You want to spend less — it's $17 cheaper.
  • Your main use case is compact.

Pros & Cons

UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)

Pros

  • +Three ports and 65W at $39.99
  • +Genuinely good as a single-laptop charger
  • +Foldable prongs and a compact 122g body
  • +UGREEN publishes the full sharing table, which many rivals do not

Cons

  • This is the clearest example of the power-sharing trap in the category: load all three ports and the secondary ports drop to 8.5W each, which is slower than a decade-old phone charger
  • The 65W headline is single-port only
  • No display

Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)

Pros

  • +30W in a genuinely tiny body — 50% more power than Apple's 20W in a similar footprint
  • +PPS support means proper fast charging on Samsung and Pixel, which Apple's brick cannot do
  • +Foldable prongs make it pocketable
  • +Anker's warranty and support are the best here

Cons

  • Single port — no good if you charge two devices at once
  • 30W will not fast-charge any laptop
  • Anker does not publish a weight for this model
  • Four years old, though nothing has superseded it

Shop by Need

FAQs

Is the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) or Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) better overall?+

Based on our 8-category scoring, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.

Which is better for Power Sharing, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores higher on Power Sharing (10.0/10 vs 4.5/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by.

Which is better for Ports, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) scores higher on Ports (7.0/10 vs 2.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once.

Which is better for Output Power, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) scores higher on Output Power (7.0/10 vs 5.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum.

Which is better for Portability, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores higher on Portability (9.5/10 vs 8.0/10) — size, weight and whether the prongs fold.

Is the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) worth the price difference over the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is the cheaper option at $22.99 versus $39.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Power Sharing.

Which is better suited to my use case?+

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) is the better fit if you mainly care about laptop or multi-device. The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is the better fit for compact.

What's the warranty on the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) vs the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) ships with a 18-month warranty; the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.

Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+

If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.

Cheaper Option

Belkin BoostCharge Pro 45W Dual USB-C GaN (WCH011) — $39.95

Premium Option

INIU 65W Dual USB-C GaN (I624) — $29.99

Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.

You May Also Like