USB Chargers / Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick.
Wins overall by 0.8 points
Quick Verdict
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port takes this by a clear 0.8 points. 140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick. The Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) only makes sense if it wins on a category you care about more than the total.
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) are both closely matched USB Charger models, and the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) is $20 cheaper than the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ($79.99 vs $99.99). On Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 6.5/10) — displays, protocol support and extras. On Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.0 vs 7.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once. On Portability, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) leads (7.5 vs 6.0/10) — size, weight and whether the prongs fold. Overall, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.6/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.8/10 for the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port | Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.99 | $79.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Max Total Output (W) | 140✓ | 100 |
| Single-Port Max | 140 from C1 or C2, 100 from C3, 44 from USB-A | 100 from USB-C, 22.5 from USB-A |
| Ports | 3x USB-C, 1x USB-A | 2x USB-C, 1x USB-A |
| GaN | Yes | Yes |
| USB-PD & PPS | PD 3.1 with PPS, plus QC3.0, SCP, AFC and UFCS | PD 3.0 with PPS |
| Foldable Prongs | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 75.74 x 59.66 x 36.02mm | 43.5 x 29 x 67.8mm |
| Weight (g) | 248 | 170✓ |
| Laptop Charging | Yes — both 14-inch and 16-inch at full speed | Yes for a 14-inch MacBook Pro at full 96W; a 16-inch needs 140W |
| Power Sharing | Two USB-C gives 70W plus 70W or 90W plus 45W. Three USB-C gives 65W plus 45W plus 30W. All four ports gives 65W plus 45W plus 12W plus 12W | Two USB-C gives 65W plus 35W for 100W total. USB-C plus USB-A gives 65W plus 22.5W. All three ports gives 89W total |
| Display | Colour smart display with touch control | None |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black, Grey | Black |
Category Scores
Output Power
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.5 — a 1.0-point margin on total wattage and single-port maximum. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Ports
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.0 — a 2.0-point margin on how many devices it can charge at once. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Power Sharing
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 8.5 against 7.5 — a 1.0-point margin on how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) leads clearly here, 7.5 against 6.0 — a 1.5-point margin on size, weight and whether the prongs fold. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Build Quality
The Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on materials, heat handling and warranty. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.5 — a 3.0-point margin on displays, protocol support and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Compatibility
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on PPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on watts and ports relative to price. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port if…
- • Features matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (displays, protocol support and extras).
- • Ports matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.0/10 here (how many devices it can charge at once).
- • Output Power matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (total wattage and single-port maximum).
- • Power Sharing matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.5/10 here (how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by).
Choose the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) scores 7.5/10 here (size, weight and whether the prongs fold).
- • You want to spend less — it's $20 cheaper.
Pros & Cons
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
Pros
- +A genuine 70W plus 70W split across two ports, which almost nothing else here achieves
- +The colour display showing real per-port wattage is the best implementation at this price
- +PD 3.1 at 140W handles a 16-inch MacBook Pro
- +The most thoroughly documented sharing table in this list
Cons
- −248g and noticeably chunky
- −All four ports loaded drops two of them to 12W
- −Baseus uses two different SKU codes for the same product, which makes cross-checking confusing
Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)
Pros
- +100W single-port genuinely fast-charges a 14-inch MacBook Pro
- +Two ports split 65W plus 35W, which is one of the more usable divisions here
- +25% smaller than the A2343 it supersedes
Cons
- −The older A2343 is still on Amazon under a different ASIN with a worse 46/30/22.5W split — check the model number before buying
- −Not enough for a 16-inch MacBook Pro
- −No display
- −Drops to 89W total with three ports loaded
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Features (9.5/10 vs 6.5/10) — displays, protocol support and extras.
Which is better for Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Ports (9.0/10 vs 7.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once.
Which is better for Portability, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) scores higher on Portability (7.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — size, weight and whether the prongs fold.
Which is better for Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Output Power (9.5/10 vs 8.5/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum.
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port worth the price difference over the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) is the cheaper option at $79.99 versus $99.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Features.
What's the warranty on the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ships with a 18-month warranty; the Anker Prime Charger 100W 3-Port GaN (A2688) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) — $59.99
Premium Option
UGREEN Nexode X 160W 4-Port — $119.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.