USB Chargers / Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick.
Wins overall by 1.1 points
Quick Verdict
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port takes this by a clear 1.1 points. 140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick. The Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) only makes sense if it wins on a category you care about more than the total.
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) are both closely matched USB Charger models, and the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) is $40 cheaper than the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ($59.99 vs $99.99). On Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 6.5/10) — displays, protocol support and extras. On Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 7.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum. On Power Sharing, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (8.5 vs 6.0/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. Overall, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.6/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.5/10 for the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port | Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.99 | $59.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2023 |
| Max Total Output (W) | 140✓ | 67 |
| Single-Port Max | 140 from C1 or C2, 100 from C3, 44 from USB-A | 67 from USB-C, 22.5 from USB-A |
| Ports | 3x USB-C, 1x USB-A | 2x USB-C, 1x USB-A |
| GaN | Yes | Yes — GaNPrime |
| USB-PD & PPS | PD 3.1 with PPS, plus QC3.0, SCP, AFC and UFCS | PD 3.0 with PPS |
| Foldable Prongs | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 75.74 x 59.66 x 36.02mm | 39.8 x 38.5 x 50mm |
| Weight (g) | 248 | 135.7✓ |
| Laptop Charging | Yes — both 14-inch and 16-inch at full speed | Yes for a 14-inch laptop at standard speed; not for a 16-inch |
| Power Sharing | Two USB-C gives 70W plus 70W or 90W plus 45W. Three USB-C gives 65W plus 45W plus 30W. All four ports gives 65W plus 45W plus 12W plus 12W | Two ports gives 45W plus 20W for 65W total. Three ports gives 64.5W total |
| Display | Colour smart display with touch control | None |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black, Grey | Black, White |
Category Scores
Output Power
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 7.0 — a 2.5-point margin on total wattage and single-port maximum. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Ports
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.0 — a 2.0-point margin on how many devices it can charge at once. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Power Sharing
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 8.5 against 6.0 — a 2.5-point margin on how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 6.0 — a 2.0-point margin on size, weight and whether the prongs fold. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Build Quality
The Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on materials, heat handling and warranty. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.5 — a 3.0-point margin on displays, protocol support and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Compatibility
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on PPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on watts and ports relative to price. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port if…
- • Features matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (displays, protocol support and extras).
- • Output Power matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (total wattage and single-port maximum).
- • Power Sharing matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.5/10 here (how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by).
- • Ports matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.0/10 here (how many devices it can charge at once).
Choose the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) scores 8.0/10 here (size, weight and whether the prongs fold).
- • You want to spend less — it's $40 cheaper.
Pros & Cons
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
Pros
- +A genuine 70W plus 70W split across two ports, which almost nothing else here achieves
- +The colour display showing real per-port wattage is the best implementation at this price
- +PD 3.1 at 140W handles a 16-inch MacBook Pro
- +The most thoroughly documented sharing table in this list
Cons
- −248g and noticeably chunky
- −All four ports loaded drops two of them to 12W
- −Baseus uses two different SKU codes for the same product, which makes cross-checking confusing
Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)
Pros
- +Holds 64.5W total even with three ports loaded, which is far better behaved than the UGREEN equivalent
- +GaNPrime runs noticeably cooler than older GaN designs
- +Anker's warranty and support
- +Frequently discounted well below the $59.99 list
Cons
- −Two ports still splits to 45W plus 20W rather than anything closer to even
- −No display at this price when the Baseus 140W has one for similar money
- −Not enough for a 16-inch laptop
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Features (9.5/10 vs 6.5/10) — displays, protocol support and extras.
Which is better for Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Output Power (9.5/10 vs 7.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum.
Which is better for Power Sharing, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Power Sharing (8.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by.
Which is better for Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Ports (9.0/10 vs 7.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once.
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port worth the price difference over the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) is the cheaper option at $59.99 versus $99.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Features.
What's the warranty on the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ships with a 18-month warranty; the Anker Prime 67W GaN Wall Charger (A2669) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) — $39.99
Premium Option
UGREEN Nexode X 160W 4-Port — $119.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.