TCRThe Comparison Report

USB Chargers / Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)

Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)

Best Overall

Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port

140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick.

Wins overall by 1.5 points

Buy on Amazon

Quick Verdict

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port takes this by a clear 1.5 points. 140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick. The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) only makes sense if it wins on a category you care about more than the total.

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) are both closely matched USB Charger models, and the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) is $60 cheaper than the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ($39.99 vs $99.99). On Power Sharing, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (8.5 vs 4.5/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. On Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — displays, protocol support and extras. On Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 7.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum. Overall, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.6/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.1/10 for the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.

Side-by-Side Comparison

SpecBaseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-PortUGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
Price$99.99$39.99
Release Year20262022
Max Total Output (W)14065
Single-Port Max140 from C1 or C2, 100 from C3, 44 from USB-A65
Ports3x USB-C, 1x USB-A2x USB-C, 1x USB-A
GaNYesYes
USB-PD & PPSPD 3.1 with PPS, plus QC3.0, SCP, AFC and UFCSPD 3.0 with PPS
Foldable ProngsYesYes
Dimensions75.74 x 59.66 x 36.02mm66 x 40.6 x 30.5mm
Weight (g)248122
Laptop ChargingYes — both 14-inch and 16-inch at full speedYes for a 14-inch laptop at standard speed; not for a 16-inch
Power SharingTwo USB-C gives 70W plus 70W or 90W plus 45W. Three USB-C gives 65W plus 45W plus 30W. All four ports gives 65W plus 45W plus 12W plus 12WTwo USB-C gives 45W plus 20W. USB-C plus USB-A gives 45W plus 18W. All three ports gives 45W plus 8.5W plus 8.5W
DisplayColour smart display with touch controlNone
Warranty18 months18 months
ColorsBlack, GreyBlack, White

Category Scores

Output PowerTotal wattage and single-port maximum
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
9.5
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
7.0
PortsHow many devices it can charge at once
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
9.0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
7.0
Power SharingHow well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
8.5
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
4.5
PortabilitySize, weight and whether the prongs fold
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
6.0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Build QualityMaterials, heat handling and warranty
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
8.0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
FeaturesDisplays, protocol support and extras
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
9.5
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
6.0
CompatibilityPPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
9.0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
ValueWatts and ports relative to price
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
9.0
UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)
8.0
Output PowerPortsPower SharingPortabilityBuild QualityFeaturesCompatibilityValue
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)

Output Power

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 7.0 — a 2.5-point margin on total wattage and single-port maximum. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Ports

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.0 — a 2.0-point margin on how many devices it can charge at once. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Power Sharing

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 8.5 against 4.5 — a 4.0-point margin on how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Portability

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 6.0 — a 2.0-point margin on size, weight and whether the prongs fold. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.

Build Quality

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) are level here, at 8.0/10 each. materials, heat handling and warranty is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.

Features

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on displays, protocol support and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Compatibility

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on PPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Value

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.0 — a 1.0-point margin on watts and ports relative to price. If that is what you are buying for, the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) does not close the gap elsewhere.

Best For

Choose the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port if…

  • Power Sharing matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.5/10 here (how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by).
  • Features matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (displays, protocol support and extras).
  • Output Power matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (total wattage and single-port maximum).
  • Ports matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.0/10 here (how many devices it can charge at once).

Choose the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) if…

  • Portability matters most to you — the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) scores 8.0/10 here (size, weight and whether the prongs fold).
  • You want to spend less — it's $60 cheaper.

Pros & Cons

Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port

Pros

  • +A genuine 70W plus 70W split across two ports, which almost nothing else here achieves
  • +The colour display showing real per-port wattage is the best implementation at this price
  • +PD 3.1 at 140W handles a 16-inch MacBook Pro
  • +The most thoroughly documented sharing table in this list

Cons

  • 248g and noticeably chunky
  • All four ports loaded drops two of them to 12W
  • Baseus uses two different SKU codes for the same product, which makes cross-checking confusing

UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)

Pros

  • +Three ports and 65W at $39.99
  • +Genuinely good as a single-laptop charger
  • +Foldable prongs and a compact 122g body
  • +UGREEN publishes the full sharing table, which many rivals do not

Cons

  • This is the clearest example of the power-sharing trap in the category: load all three ports and the secondary ports drop to 8.5W each, which is slower than a decade-old phone charger
  • The 65W headline is single-port only
  • No display

Shop by Need

FAQs

Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) better overall?+

Based on our 8-category scoring, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.

Which is better for Power Sharing, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Power Sharing (8.5/10 vs 4.5/10) — how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by.

Which is better for Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Features (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — displays, protocol support and extras.

Which is better for Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Output Power (9.5/10 vs 7.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum.

Which is better for Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Ports (9.0/10 vs 7.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once.

Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port worth the price difference over the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) is the cheaper option at $39.99 versus $99.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Power Sharing.

What's the warranty on the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334)?+

The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ships with a 18-month warranty; the UGREEN Nexode 65W 3-Port (10334) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.

Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+

If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.

Cheaper Option

Belkin BoostCharge Pro 45W Dual USB-C GaN (WCH011) — $39.95

Premium Option

UGREEN Nexode X 160W 4-Port — $119.99

Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.

You May Also Like