Wireless Chargers / Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) vs Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
$129.99
VSBaseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
$89.99
Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) vs Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
The cheapest real Qi2.2 3-in-1 with the adapter included.
Wins overall by 0.1 points
Quick Verdict
This is close. The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) edges ahead by 0.1 points, but that margin is inside the noise — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) is a defensible pick on its own terms. Aluminium with UK and EU plugs included — but 399g is no travel weight.
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) and Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) are both current-generation wireless Charger models, and the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is $40 cheaper than the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) ($89.99 vs $129.99). On Portability, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads (8.0 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality. On Value, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads (9.5 vs 7.5/10) — speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. On Build Quality, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads (9.0 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability. Overall, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores 8.0/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.9/10 for the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA), though the gap is close enough that your specific use case should decide it. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) | Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129.99 | $89.99 |
| Release Year | 2025 | 2025 |
| Type | 3-in-1, foldable | 3-in-1, travel folding |
| Qi Standard | Qi2 25W, equivalent to the Qi2.2 class | Qi2.2, certified at 25W |
| Max Phone Output (W) | 25 | 25 |
| Devices Charged | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds |
| Apple Watch Charging | Yes, with fast charging for Series 7 to 11, SE 3 and Ultra | Yes, with fast charging |
| Magnetic Alignment | Yes | Yes |
| Power Adapter Included | Yes — a 45W adapter with UK and EU plugs | Yes — a 45W adapter |
| Cable | Detachable USB-C | Detachable, included |
| Foldable | Yes | Yes |
| Cooling | Passive | Passive — no active fan |
| Weight (g) | 399 | 254✓ |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Space Grey | Black, White |
Category Scores
Charging Speed
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) and Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) are level here, at 8.5/10 each. real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Device Support
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) and Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) are level here, at 9.0/10 each. how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Build Quality
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on materials, finish and durability. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Cooling
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads clearly here, 6.0 against 5.5 — a 0.5-point margin on whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 5.5 — a 2.5-point margin on weight, folding design and travel practicality. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) and Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) are level here, at 8.5/10 each. kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Design
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on how it looks on a desk or nightstand. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 7.5 — a 2.0-point margin on speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) if…
- • Build Quality matters most to you — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores 9.0/10 here (materials, finish and durability).
- • Design matters most to you — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores 9.0/10 here (how it looks on a desk or nightstand).
- • Cooling matters most to you — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores 6.0/10 here (whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load).
- • Your main use case is desk.
Choose the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores 8.0/10 here (weight, folding design and travel practicality).
- • Value matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores 9.5/10 here (speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately).
- • You want to spend less — it's $40 cheaper.
- • Your main use case is travel.
Pros & Cons
Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
Pros
- +The included adapter ships with UK and EU plugs, making it the most genuinely international charger here
- +Aluminium build quality matches the Twelve South
- +Full three-device charging with watch fast charging
Cons
- −399g is by far the heaviest charger here, which undercuts the travel positioning it is sold on
- −Passive cooling means it will throttle below 25W under sustained load, unlike the Anker and ESR
- −$129.99 and heavier than rivals that cost the same
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
Pros
- +The cheapest genuine Qi2.2 3-in-1 with a 45W adapter included — roughly $60 less than the Anker for the same core function
- +Folds for travel at 254g
- +Full watch fast charging
Cons
- −Passive cooling only, so sustained 25W will throttle where the Anker and ESR hold it
- −Plastic construction next to the aluminium Satechi and Twelve South
- −Several Apple phones including the SE, mini and 16e are excluded from magnetic alignment
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) or Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Portability, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) or the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores higher on Portability (8.0/10 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality.
Which is better for Value, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) or the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores higher on Value (9.5/10 vs 7.5/10) — speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately.
Which is better for Build Quality, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) or the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores higher on Build Quality (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability.
Which is better for Design, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) or the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores higher on Design (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — how it looks on a desk or nightstand.
Is the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) worth the price difference over the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is the cheaper option at $89.99 versus $129.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Portability.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) is the better fit if you mainly care about desk. The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is the better fit for travel.
What's the warranty on the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) vs the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) ships with a 18-month warranty; the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) — $89.99
Premium Option
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W — $129.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.