Wireless Chargers / Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) vs ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) vs ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Active cooling holds a real 25W, and a 50W adapter is in the box.
Wins overall by 0.3 points
Quick Verdict
This is close. The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W edges ahead by 0.3 points, but that margin is inside the noise — the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is a defensible pick on its own terms. The cheapest real Qi2.2 3-in-1 with the adapter included.
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) and ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W are both closely matched wireless Charger models, and the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is $40 cheaper than the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ($89.99 vs $129.99). On Cooling, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads (9.5 vs 5.5/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. On Portability, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads (8.0 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality. On Charging Speed, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads (9.5 vs 8.5/10) — real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to. Overall, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 8.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 8.0/10 for the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21), though the gap is close enough that your specific use case should decide it. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) | ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $89.99 | $129.99 |
| Release Year | 2025 | 2026 |
| Type | 3-in-1, travel folding | 3-in-1 |
| Qi Standard | Qi2.2, certified at 25W | Qi2.2, certified at 25W |
| Max Phone Output (W) | 25 | 25 |
| Devices Charged | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds |
| Apple Watch Charging | Yes, with fast charging | Yes, with fast charging |
| Magnetic Alignment | Yes | Yes |
| Power Adapter Included | Yes — a 45W adapter | Yes — a 50W adapter |
| Cable | Detachable, included | Detachable, 1.5m |
| Foldable | Yes | No on the stand version; a foldable sibling exists |
| Cooling | Passive — no active fan | Active fan, marketed as CryoBoost |
| Weight (g) | 254 | Not published by the manufacturer |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black, White | Black |
Category Scores
Charging Speed
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.5 — a 1.0-point margin on real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Device Support
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) and ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W are level here, at 9.0/10 each. how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Build Quality
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) and ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W are level here, at 7.5/10 each. materials, finish and durability is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Cooling
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 5.5 — a 4.0-point margin on whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads clearly here, 8.0 against 5.5 — a 2.5-point margin on weight, folding design and travel practicality. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Design
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) and ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W are level here, at 7.5/10 each. how it looks on a desk or nightstand is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Value
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.5 — a 1.0-point margin on speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores 8.0/10 here (weight, folding design and travel practicality).
- • Value matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores 9.5/10 here (speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately).
- • You want to spend less — it's $40 cheaper.
- • Your main use case is travel.
Choose the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W if…
- • Cooling matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load).
- • Charging Speed matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to).
- • Features matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.0/10 here (kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras).
- • Your main use case is desk.
Pros & Cons
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21)
Pros
- +The cheapest genuine Qi2.2 3-in-1 with a 45W adapter included — roughly $60 less than the Anker for the same core function
- +Folds for travel at 254g
- +Full watch fast charging
Cons
- −Passive cooling only, so sustained 25W will throttle where the Anker and ESR hold it
- −Plastic construction next to the aluminium Satechi and Twelve South
- −Several Apple phones including the SE, mini and 16e are excluded from magnetic alignment
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Pros
- +Active cooling means it actually holds 25W under sustained load, where passive rivals throttle
- +A 50W adapter is included, which alone is worth $30 to $40
- +Charges all three Apple devices with genuine watch fast charging
Cons
- −The fan is audible in a quiet bedroom
- −The stand version does not fold, so it is a desk fixture
- −ESR publishes no weight
- −Plastic construction at $129.99
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) or ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Cooling, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) or the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Cooling (9.5/10 vs 5.5/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load.
Which is better for Portability, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) or the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores higher on Portability (8.0/10 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality.
Which is better for Charging Speed, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) or the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Charging Speed (9.5/10 vs 8.5/10) — real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to.
Which is better for Value, the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) or the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) scores higher on Value (9.5/10 vs 8.5/10) — speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately.
Is the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) worth the price difference over the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is the cheaper option at $89.99 versus $129.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Cooling.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) is the better fit if you mainly care about travel. The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the better fit for desk.
What's the warranty on the Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) vs the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W?+
The Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) ships with a 18-month warranty; the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 — $79.99
Premium Option
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) — $149.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.