Wireless Chargers / ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
$129.99
VSSatechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
$129.99
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Active cooling holds a real 25W, and a 50W adapter is in the box.
Wins overall by 0.4 points
Quick Verdict
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the stronger all-round pick, ahead by 0.4 points. Active cooling holds a real 25W, and a 50W adapter is in the box.
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) are both closely matched wireless Charger models, and they're priced almost identically ($129.99 vs $129.99). On Cooling, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. On Build Quality, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads (9.0 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability. On Design, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads (9.0 vs 7.5/10) — how it looks on a desk or nightstand. Overall, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 8.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.9/10 for the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W | Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129.99 | $129.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2025 |
| Type | 3-in-1 | 3-in-1, foldable |
| Qi Standard | Qi2.2, certified at 25W | Qi2 25W, equivalent to the Qi2.2 class |
| Max Phone Output (W) | 25 | 25 |
| Devices Charged | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds |
| Apple Watch Charging | Yes, with fast charging | Yes, with fast charging for Series 7 to 11, SE 3 and Ultra |
| Magnetic Alignment | Yes | Yes |
| Power Adapter Included | Yes — a 50W adapter | Yes — a 45W adapter with UK and EU plugs |
| Cable | Detachable, 1.5m | Detachable USB-C |
| Foldable | No on the stand version; a foldable sibling exists | Yes |
| Cooling | Active fan, marketed as CryoBoost | Passive |
| Weight (g) | Not published by the manufacturer | 399 |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black | Space Grey |
Category Scores
Charging Speed
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 8.5 — a 1.0-point margin on real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Device Support
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) are level here, at 9.0/10 each. how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Build Quality
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on materials, finish and durability. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Cooling
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) are level here, at 5.5/10 each. weight, folding design and travel practicality is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Features
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Design
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on how it looks on a desk or nightstand. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 8.5 against 7.5 — a 1.0-point margin on speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. If that is what you are buying for, the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W if…
- • Cooling matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load).
- • Charging Speed matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to).
- • Value matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 8.5/10 here (speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately).
Choose the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) if…
- • Build Quality matters most to you — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores 9.0/10 here (materials, finish and durability).
- • Design matters most to you — the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores 9.0/10 here (how it looks on a desk or nightstand).
Pros & Cons
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Pros
- +Active cooling means it actually holds 25W under sustained load, where passive rivals throttle
- +A 50W adapter is included, which alone is worth $30 to $40
- +Charges all three Apple devices with genuine watch fast charging
Cons
- −The fan is audible in a quiet bedroom
- −The stand version does not fold, so it is a desk fixture
- −ESR publishes no weight
- −Plastic construction at $129.99
Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)
Pros
- +The included adapter ships with UK and EU plugs, making it the most genuinely international charger here
- +Aluminium build quality matches the Twelve South
- +Full three-device charging with watch fast charging
Cons
- −399g is by far the heaviest charger here, which undercuts the travel positioning it is sold on
- −Passive cooling means it will throttle below 25W under sustained load, unlike the Anker and ESR
- −$129.99 and heavier than rivals that cost the same
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Cooling, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Cooling (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load.
Which is better for Build Quality, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores higher on Build Quality (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability.
Which is better for Design, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
The Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) scores higher on Design (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — how it looks on a desk or nightstand.
Which is better for Charging Speed, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Charging Speed (9.5/10 vs 8.5/10) — real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to.
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W worth the price difference over the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
They're priced the same ($129.99), so the decision comes down to which specific features and scores matter more to you rather than budget.
What's the warranty on the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA)?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ships with a 18-month warranty; the Satechi 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W Stand (ST-Q25F31C-EA) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) — $89.99
Premium Option
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) — $149.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.