Wireless Chargers / ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Active cooling holds a real 25W, and a 50W adapter is in the box.
Wins overall by 0.5 points
Quick Verdict
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the stronger all-round pick, ahead by 0.5 points. Active cooling holds a real 25W, and a 50W adapter is in the box.
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 are both closely matched wireless Charger models, and the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 is $50 cheaper than the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ($79.99 vs $129.99). On Portability, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 leads (9.5 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality. On Cooling, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. On Charging Speed, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads (9.5 vs 6.5/10) — real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to. Overall, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 8.3/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.8/10 for the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W | Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129.99 | $79.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2024 |
| Type | 3-in-1 | 2-in-1, travel folding |
| Qi Standard | Qi2.2, certified at 25W | Qi2, certified at 15W |
| Max Phone Output (W) | 25✓ | 15 |
| Devices Charged | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds | Phone plus Apple Watch, or AirPods on the watch puck — not both at once |
| Apple Watch Charging | Yes, with fast charging | Yes, with fast charging at 5W |
| Magnetic Alignment | Yes | Yes |
| Power Adapter Included | Yes — a 50W adapter | No — needs a 30W or better adapter |
| Cable | Detachable, 1.5m | Detachable 1m braided, included |
| Foldable | No on the stand version; a foldable sibling exists | Yes |
| Cooling | Active fan, marketed as CryoBoost | Passive |
| Weight (g) | Not published by the manufacturer | 119 |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black | Black, White |
Category Scores
Charging Speed
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.5 — a 3.0-point margin on real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to. If that is what you are buying for, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 does not close the gap elsewhere.
Device Support
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.0 — a 2.0-point margin on how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast. If that is what you are buying for, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 does not close the gap elsewhere.
Build Quality
The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 leads clearly here, 9.5 against 7.5 — a 2.0-point margin on materials, finish and durability. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Cooling
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load. If that is what you are buying for, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 leads clearly here, 9.5 against 5.5 — a 4.0-point margin on weight, folding design and travel practicality. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 does not close the gap elsewhere.
Design
The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 leads clearly here, 9.5 against 7.5 — a 2.0-point margin on how it looks on a desk or nightstand. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 8.5 against 7.0 — a 1.5-point margin on speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. If that is what you are buying for, the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W if…
- • Cooling matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load).
- • Charging Speed matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.5/10 here (real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to).
- • Device Support matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 9.0/10 here (how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast).
- • Your main use case is desk or multi-device.
Choose the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 scores 9.5/10 here (weight, folding design and travel practicality).
- • Build Quality matters most to you — the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 scores 9.5/10 here (materials, finish and durability).
- • You want to spend less — it's $50 cheaper.
- • Your main use case is travel.
Pros & Cons
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Pros
- +Active cooling means it actually holds 25W under sustained load, where passive rivals throttle
- +A 50W adapter is included, which alone is worth $30 to $40
- +Charges all three Apple devices with genuine watch fast charging
Cons
- −The fan is audible in a quiet bedroom
- −The stand version does not fold, so it is a desk fixture
- −ESR publishes no weight
- −Plastic construction at $129.99
Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1
Pros
- +The best-built travel charger here — aluminium and leather rather than plastic
- +Genuine Apple Watch fast charging, which the cheaper 2-in-1s do not offer at all
- +119g and folds to palm size
- +Braided cable included
Cons
- −Qi2 15W rather than Qi2.2 25W, so phone charging is a generation behind
- −The watch puck charges either the watch or AirPods, not both
- −No adapter included, and it needs 30W or more
- −$79.99 for 15W is a lot if you do not care about the build
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Portability, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 scores higher on Portability (9.5/10 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality.
Which is better for Cooling, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Cooling (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load.
Which is better for Charging Speed, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Charging Speed (9.5/10 vs 6.5/10) — real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to.
Which is better for Device Support, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores higher on Device Support (9.0/10 vs 7.0/10) — how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast.
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W worth the price difference over the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 is the cheaper option at $79.99 versus $129.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Portability.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the better fit if you mainly care about desk or multi-device. The Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 is the better fit for travel.
What's the warranty on the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ships with a 18-month warranty; the Twelve South ButterFly SE 2-in-1 ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Belkin UltraCharge 2-in-1 Foldable Qi2 25W (WIZ039) — $59.99
Premium Option
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) — $149.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.