Wireless Chargers / ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
$129.99
VSAnker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)
$149.99
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)
Folds for travel AND has a 19dB fan — sustained 25W anywhere.
Wins overall by 0.7 points
Quick Verdict
A 0.7-point gap makes the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) the straightforward choice here. Folds for travel AND has a 19dB fan — sustained 25W anywhere.
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) are both current-generation wireless Charger models, and the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is $20 cheaper than the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) ($129.99 vs $149.99). On Portability, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads (8.5 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality. On Build Quality, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads (9.0 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability. On Design, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads (9.0 vs 7.5/10) — how it looks on a desk or nightstand. Overall, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores 9.0/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 8.3/10 for the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W. Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W | Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $129.99 | $149.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Type | 3-in-1 | 3-in-1, travel folding |
| Qi Standard | Qi2.2, certified at 25W | Qi2.2, certified at 25W |
| Max Phone Output (W) | 25 | 25 |
| Devices Charged | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds | Phone, Apple Watch and earbuds |
| Apple Watch Charging | Yes, with fast charging | Yes, with fast charging at 5W |
| Magnetic Alignment | Yes | Yes |
| Power Adapter Included | Yes — a 50W adapter | Yes — a 45W adapter |
| Cable | Detachable, 1.5m | Detachable, 1.5m |
| Foldable | No on the stand version; a foldable sibling exists | Yes |
| Cooling | Active fan, marketed as CryoBoost | Active fan, marketed as AirCool, rated 19dB |
| Weight (g) | Not published by the manufacturer | 224 |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black | Black |
Category Scores
Charging Speed
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) are level here, at 9.5/10 each. real wireless wattage and which Qi standard it is certified to is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Device Support
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) are level here, at 9.0/10 each. how many devices it charges, and whether the watch charges fast is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Build Quality
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on materials, finish and durability. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Cooling
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W and Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) are level here, at 9.5/10 each. whether it sustains full wattage or throttles under load is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Portability
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 5.5 — a 3.0-point margin on weight, folding design and travel practicality. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 9.0 — a 0.5-point margin on kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Design
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) leads clearly here, 9.0 against 7.5 — a 1.5-point margin on how it looks on a desk or nightstand. If that is what you are buying for, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W leads clearly here, 8.5 against 8.0 — a 0.5-point margin on speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Best For
Choose the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W if…
- • Value matters most to you — the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W scores 8.5/10 here (speed and device support relative to price, including any adapter you must buy separately).
- • You want to spend less — it's $20 cheaper.
Choose the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores 8.5/10 here (weight, folding design and travel practicality).
- • Build Quality matters most to you — the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores 9.0/10 here (materials, finish and durability).
- • Design matters most to you — the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores 9.0/10 here (how it looks on a desk or nightstand).
- • Features matters most to you — the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores 9.5/10 here (kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras).
- • Your main use case is travel.
Pros & Cons
ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W
Pros
- +Active cooling means it actually holds 25W under sustained load, where passive rivals throttle
- +A 50W adapter is included, which alone is worth $30 to $40
- +Charges all three Apple devices with genuine watch fast charging
Cons
- −The fan is audible in a quiet bedroom
- −The stand version does not fold, so it is a desk fixture
- −ESR publishes no weight
- −Plastic construction at $129.99
Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)
Pros
- +The only charger here that both folds for travel and has active cooling — you get sustained 25W in a bag-friendly package
- +19dB fan is genuinely inaudible in a bedroom, unlike the ESR
- +45W adapter included
- +224g, light for a cooled 3-in-1
Cons
- −$149.99 is the highest list price here
- −Anker's own product page says a 45W adapter is needed separately while the Amazon listing and reviews confirm one is included — verify before buying
- −Fan means moving parts that can eventually fail
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Portability, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores higher on Portability (8.5/10 vs 5.5/10) — weight, folding design and travel practicality.
Which is better for Build Quality, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores higher on Build Quality (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — materials, finish and durability.
Which is better for Design, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores higher on Design (9.0/10 vs 7.5/10) — how it looks on a desk or nightstand.
Which is better for Features, the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W or the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) scores higher on Features (9.5/10 vs 9.0/10) — kickstands, adapters included, international plugs and extras.
Is the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W worth the price difference over the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the cheaper option at $129.99 versus $149.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Portability.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W is the better fit if you mainly care about desk or multi-device. The Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) is the better fit for travel.
What's the warranty on the ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W vs the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1)?+
The ESR HaloLock CryoBoost 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W ships with a 18-month warranty; the Anker Prime 3-in-1 Foldable Qi2.2 25W (A25N1) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Baseus PicoGo 3-in-1 Qi2.2 25W (AF21) — $89.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.