USB Chargers / Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick.
Wins overall by 1.3 points
Quick Verdict
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port is the stronger all-round pick, ahead by 1.3 points. 140W with a real 70+70W split and a colour display — the power user's pick.
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) are both closely matched USB Charger models, and the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is $77 cheaper than the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ($22.99 vs $99.99). On Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.0 vs 2.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once. On Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads (9.5 vs 5.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum. On Portability, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads (9.5 vs 6.0/10) — size, weight and whether the prongs fold. Overall, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 8.6/10 across our 8 scoring categories versus 7.3/10 for the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147). Below, we break down the full spec sheet, category-by-category scores, and exactly who should buy which one.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Spec | Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port | Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $99.99 | $22.99 |
| Release Year | 2026 | 2022 |
| Max Total Output (W) | 140✓ | 30 |
| Single-Port Max | 140 from C1 or C2, 100 from C3, 44 from USB-A | 30 |
| Ports | 3x USB-C, 1x USB-A | 1x USB-C |
| GaN | Yes | Yes |
| USB-PD & PPS | PD 3.1 with PPS, plus QC3.0, SCP, AFC and UFCS | PD 3.0 with PPS (3.3-11V/2.7A and 3.3-16V/2A) |
| Foldable Prongs | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 75.74 x 59.66 x 36.02mm | 28.4 x 28.4 x 35.3mm |
| Weight (g) | 248 | Not published by the manufacturer |
| Laptop Charging | Yes — both 14-inch and 16-inch at full speed | No |
| Power Sharing | Two USB-C gives 70W plus 70W or 90W plus 45W. Three USB-C gives 65W plus 45W plus 30W. All four ports gives 65W plus 45W plus 12W plus 12W | Not applicable — single port |
| Display | Colour smart display with touch control | None |
| Warranty | 18 months | 18 months |
| Colors | Black, Grey | Black, White, Blue, Green |
Category Scores
Output Power
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 5.0 — a 4.5-point margin on total wattage and single-port maximum. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Ports
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 2.0 — a 7.0-point margin on how many devices it can charge at once. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Power Sharing
The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 10.0 against 8.5 — a 1.5-point margin on how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Portability
The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on size, weight and whether the prongs fold. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Build Quality
The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) leads clearly here, 8.5 against 8.0 — a 0.5-point margin on materials, heat handling and warranty. If that is what you are buying for, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port does not close the gap elsewhere.
Features
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.5 against 6.0 — a 3.5-point margin on displays, protocol support and extras. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Compatibility
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port leads clearly here, 9.0 against 8.5 — a 0.5-point margin on PPS, PD version and support for Samsung, Pixel and Apple fast charging. If that is what you are buying for, the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) does not close the gap elsewhere.
Value
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port and Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) are level here, at 9.0/10 each. watts and ports relative to price is not what separates these two — look to the categories where the scores diverge.
Best For
Choose the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port if…
- • Ports matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.0/10 here (how many devices it can charge at once).
- • Output Power matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (total wattage and single-port maximum).
- • Features matters most to you — the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores 9.5/10 here (displays, protocol support and extras).
- • Your main use case is laptop or multi-device.
Choose the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) if…
- • Portability matters most to you — the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 9.5/10 here (size, weight and whether the prongs fold).
- • Power Sharing matters most to you — the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores 10.0/10 here (how well it holds wattage when several ports are in use — the spec buyers most often get caught by).
- • You want to spend less — it's $77 cheaper.
- • Your main use case is compact.
Pros & Cons
Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port
Pros
- +A genuine 70W plus 70W split across two ports, which almost nothing else here achieves
- +The colour display showing real per-port wattage is the best implementation at this price
- +PD 3.1 at 140W handles a 16-inch MacBook Pro
- +The most thoroughly documented sharing table in this list
Cons
- −248g and noticeably chunky
- −All four ports loaded drops two of them to 12W
- −Baseus uses two different SKU codes for the same product, which makes cross-checking confusing
Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)
Pros
- +30W in a genuinely tiny body — 50% more power than Apple's 20W in a similar footprint
- +PPS support means proper fast charging on Samsung and Pixel, which Apple's brick cannot do
- +Foldable prongs make it pocketable
- +Anker's warranty and support are the best here
Cons
- −Single port — no good if you charge two devices at once
- −30W will not fast-charge any laptop
- −Anker does not publish a weight for this model
- −Four years old, though nothing has superseded it
Shop by Need
FAQs
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) better overall?+
Based on our 8-category scoring, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port comes out ahead overall. See the full breakdown in the scores section above — the right pick still depends on which categories matter most for your use case.
Which is better for Ports, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Ports (9.0/10 vs 2.0/10) — how many devices it can charge at once.
Which is better for Output Power, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Output Power (9.5/10 vs 5.0/10) — total wattage and single-port maximum.
Which is better for Portability, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) scores higher on Portability (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — size, weight and whether the prongs fold.
Which is better for Features, the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port or the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port scores higher on Features (9.5/10 vs 6.0/10) — displays, protocol support and extras.
Is the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port worth the price difference over the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is the cheaper option at $22.99 versus $99.99. Whether the pricier model is "worth it" depends on how much you value its lead in Ports.
Which is better suited to my use case?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port is the better fit if you mainly care about laptop or multi-device. The Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) is the better fit for compact.
What's the warranty on the Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port vs the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147)?+
The Baseus PicoGo AH11 140W 4-Port ships with a 18-month warranty; the Anker Nano Charger 30W (A2147) ships with a 18-month warranty. Always confirm current terms on the manufacturer's site before buying.
Should I wait for the next model instead of buying either of these?+
If either model is more than two years old, a successor may be close — check the "Latest Model" link on each product page. Otherwise, both are current, well-supported options and there's no strong reason to wait.
Cheaper Option
Apple 20W USB-C Power Adapter (A2305) — $19.00
Premium Option
UGREEN Nexode X 160W 4-Port — $119.99
Specifications and prices for both products last verified . Scores are calculated from published specifications — see how we compare products.